lockdep.c

	printk(":\n");
	print_stack_trace(&target->trace, 6);

	return 0;
}

/*
 * When a circular dependency is detected, print the
 * header first:
 */
static noinline int
print_circular_bug_header(struct lock_list *entry, unsigned int depth,
			struct held_lock *check_src,
			struct held_lock *check_tgt)
{
	struct task_struct *curr = current;

	if (debug_locks_silent)
		return 0;

	printk("\n=======================================================\n");
	printk(  "[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]\n");
	print_kernel_version();
	printk(  "-------------------------------------------------------\n");
	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
	print_lock(check_src);
	printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n");
	print_lock(check_tgt);
	printk("\nwhich lock already depends on the new lock.\n\n");
	printk("\nthe existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:\n");

	print_circular_bug_entry(entry, depth);

	return 0;
}

static inline int class_equal(struct lock_list *entry, void *data)
{
	return entry->class == data;
}

static noinline int print_circular_bug(struct lock_list *this,
				struct lock_list *target,
				struct held_lock *check_src,
				struct held_lock *check_tgt)
{
	struct task_struct *curr = current;
	struct lock_list *parent;
	unsigned long depth;

	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
		return 0;

	if (!save_trace(&this->trace))
		return 0;

	depth = get_lock_depth(target);

	print_circular_bug_header(target, depth, check_src, check_tgt);

	parent = get_lock_parent(target);

	while (parent) {
		print_circular_bug_entry(parent, --depth);
		parent = get_lock_parent(parent);
	}

	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);

	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
	dump_stack();

	return 0;
}

static noinline int print_bfs_bug(int ret)
{
	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
		return 0;

	WARN(1, "lockdep bfs error:%d\n", ret);

	return 0;
}

unsigned long __lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_class *class,
					   unsigned int depth)
{
	struct lock_list *entry;
	unsigned long ret = 1;

	if (lockdep_dependency_visit(class, depth))
		return 0;

	/*
	 * Recurse this class's dependency list:
	 */
	list_for_each_entry(entry, &class->locks_after, entry)
		ret += __lockdep_count_forward_deps(entry->class, depth + 1);

	return ret;
}

unsigned long lockdep_count_forward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
{
	unsigned long ret, flags;

	local_irq_save(flags);
	__raw_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
	ret = __lockdep_count_forward_deps(class, 0);
	__raw_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
	local_irq_restore(flags);

	return ret;
}

unsigned long __lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class,
					    unsigned int depth)
{
	struct lock_list *entry;
	unsigned long ret = 1;

	if (lockdep_dependency_visit(class, depth))
		return 0;
	/*
	 * Recurse this class's dependency list:
	 */
	list_for_each_entry(entry, &class->locks_before, entry)
		ret += __lockdep_count_backward_deps(entry->class, depth + 1);

	return ret;
}

unsigned long lockdep_count_backward_deps(struct lock_class *class)
{
	unsigned long ret, flags;

	local_irq_save(flags);
	__raw_spin_lock(&lockdep_lock);
	ret = __lockdep_count_backward_deps(class, 0);
	__raw_spin_unlock(&lockdep_lock);
	local_irq_restore(flags);

	return ret;
}

/*
 * Prove that the dependency graph starting at <entry> can not
 * lead to <target>. Print an error and return 0 if it does.
 */
static noinline int
check_noncircular(struct lock_list *root, struct lock_class *target,
		struct lock_list **target_entry)
{
	int result;

	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_cyclic_checks);

	result = __bfs_forwards(root, target, class_equal, target_entry);

	return result;
}

#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)
/*
 * Forwards and backwards subgraph searching, for the purposes of
 * proving that two subgraphs can be connected by a new dependency
 * without creating any illegal irq-safe -> irq-unsafe lock dependency.
 */
static struct lock_class *forwards_match, *backwards_match;


#define   BFS_PROCESS_RET(ret)	do { \
					if (ret < 0) \
						return print_bfs_bug(ret); \
					if (ret == 1) \
						return 1; \
				} while (0)

static inline int usage_match(struct lock_list *entry, void *bit)
{
	return entry->class->usage_mask & (1 << (enum lock_usage_bit)bit);
}



/*
 * Find a node in the forwards-direction dependency sub-graph starting
 * at @root->class that matches @bit.
 *
 * Return 0 if such a node exists in the subgraph, and put that node
 * into *@target_entry.
 *
 * Return 1 otherwise and keep *@target_entry unchanged.
 * Return <0 on error.
 */
static int
find_usage_forwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit,
			struct lock_list **target_entry)
{
	int result;

	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_forwards_checks);

	result = __bfs_forwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry);

	return result;
}

/*
 * Find a node in the backwards-direction dependency sub-graph starting
 * at @root->class that matches @bit.
 *
 * Return 0 if such a node exists in the subgraph, and put that node
 * into *@target_entry.
 *
 * Return 1 otherwise and keep *@target_entry unchanged.
 * Return <0 on error.
 */
static int
find_usage_backwards(struct lock_list *root, enum lock_usage_bit bit,
			struct lock_list **target_entry)
{
	int result;

	debug_atomic_inc(&nr_find_usage_backwards_checks);

	result = __bfs_backwards(root, (void *)bit, usage_match, target_entry);

	return result;
}


static int
print_bad_irq_dependency(struct task_struct *curr,
			 struct held_lock *prev,
			 struct held_lock *next,
			 enum lock_usage_bit bit1,
			 enum lock_usage_bit bit2,
			 const char *irqclass)
{
	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
		return 0;

	printk("\n======================================================\n");
	printk(  "[ INFO: %s-safe -> %s-unsafe lock order detected ]\n",
		irqclass, irqclass);
	print_kernel_version();
	printk(  "------------------------------------------------------\n");
	printk("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] is trying to acquire:\n",
		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr),
		curr->hardirq_context, hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
		curr->softirq_context, softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
		curr->hardirqs_enabled,
		curr->softirqs_enabled);
	print_lock(next);

	printk("\nand this task is already holding:\n");
	print_lock(prev);
	printk("which would create a new lock dependency:\n");
	print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev));
	printk(" ->");
	print_lock_name(hlock_class(next));
	printk("\n");

	printk("\nbut this new dependency connects a %s-irq-safe lock:\n",
		irqclass);
	print_lock_name(backwards_match);
	printk("\n... which became %s-irq-safe at:\n", irqclass);

	print_stack_trace(backwards_match->usage_traces + bit1, 1);

	printk("\nto a %s-irq-unsafe lock:\n", irqclass);
	print_lock_name(forwards_match);
	printk("\n... which became %s-irq-unsafe at:\n", irqclass);
	printk("...");

	print_stack_trace(forwards_match->usage_traces + bit2, 1);

	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n\n");
	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);

	printk("\nthe %s-irq-safe lock's dependencies:\n", irqclass);
	print_lock_dependencies(backwards_match, 0);

	printk("\nthe %s-irq-unsafe lock's dependencies:\n", irqclass);
	print_lock_dependencies(forwards_match, 0);

	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
	dump_stack();

	return 0;
}

static int
check_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
	    struct held_lock *next, enum lock_usage_bit bit_backwards,
	    enum lock_usage_bit bit_forwards, const char *irqclass)
{
	int ret;
	struct lock_list this;
	struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);

	this.parent = NULL;

	this.class = hlock_class(prev);
	ret = find_usage_backwards(&this, bit_backwards, &target_entry);
	BFS_PROCESS_RET(ret);
	backwards_match = target_entry->class;

	this.class = hlock_class(next);
	ret = find_usage_forwards(&this, bit_forwards, &target_entry);
	BFS_PROCESS_RET(ret);
	forwards_match = target_entry->class;

	return print_bad_irq_dependency(curr, prev, next,
			bit_backwards, bit_forwards, irqclass);
}

static const char *state_names[] = {
#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \
	__stringify(__STATE),
#include "lockdep_states.h"
#undef LOCKDEP_STATE
};

static const char *state_rnames[] = {
#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \
	__stringify(__STATE)"-READ",
#include "lockdep_states.h"
#undef LOCKDEP_STATE
};

static inline const char *state_name(enum lock_usage_bit bit)
{
	return (bit & 1) ? state_rnames[bit >> 2] : state_names[bit >> 2];
}

static int exclusive_bit(int new_bit)
{
	/*
	 * USED_IN
	 * USED_IN_READ
	 * ENABLED
	 * ENABLED_READ
	 *
	 * bit 0 - write/read
	 * bit 1 - used_in/enabled
	 * bit 2+  state
	 */

	int state = new_bit & ~3;
	int dir = new_bit & 2;

	/*
	 * keep state, bit flip the direction and strip read.
	 */
	return state | (dir ^ 2);
}

static int check_irq_usage(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
			   struct held_lock *next, enum lock_usage_bit bit)
{
	/*
	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe
	 * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
	 */
	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, bit,
			   exclusive_bit(bit), state_name(bit)))
		return 0;

	bit++; /* _READ */

	/*
	 * Prove that the new dependency does not connect a hardirq-safe-read
	 * lock with a hardirq-unsafe lock - to achieve this we search
	 * the backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>, and the
	 * forwards-subgraph starting at <next>:
	 */
	if (!check_usage(curr, prev, next, bit,
			   exclusive_bit(bit), state_name(bit)))
		return 0;

	return 1;
}

static int
check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
		struct held_lock *next)
{
#define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE)						\
	if (!check_irq_usage(curr, prev, next, LOCK_USED_IN_##__STATE))	\
		return 0;
#include "lockdep_states.h"
#undef LOCKDEP_STATE

	return 1;
}

static void inc_chains(void)
{
	if (current->hardirq_context)
		nr_hardirq_chains++;
	else {
		if (current->softirq_context)
			nr_softirq_chains++;
		else
			nr_process_chains++;
	}
}

#else

static inline int
check_prev_add_irq(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
		struct held_lock *next)
{
	return 1;
}

static inline void inc_chains(void)
{
	nr_process_chains++;
}

#endif

static int
print_deadlock_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
		   struct held_lock *next)
{
	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
		return 0;

	printk("\n=============================================\n");
	printk(  "[ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]\n");
	print_kernel_version();
	printk(  "---------------------------------------------\n");
	printk("%s/%d is trying to acquire lock:\n",
		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
	print_lock(next);
	printk("\nbut task is already holding lock:\n");
	print_lock(prev);

	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);

	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
	dump_stack();

	return 0;
}

/*
 * Check whether we are holding such a class already.
 *
 * (Note that this has to be done separately, because the graph cannot
 * detect such classes of deadlocks.)
 *
 * Returns: 0 on deadlock detected, 1 on OK, 2 on recursive read
 */
static int
check_deadlock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next,
	       struct lockdep_map *next_instance, int read)
{
	struct held_lock *prev;
	struct held_lock *nest = NULL;
	int i;

	for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
		prev = curr->held_locks + i;

		if (prev->instance == next->nest_lock)
			nest = prev;

		if (hlock_class(prev) != hlock_class(next))
			continue;

		/*
		 * Allow read-after-read recursion of the same
		 * lock class (i.e. read_lock(lock)+read_lock(lock)):
		 */
		if ((read == 2) && prev->read)
			return 2;

		/*
		 * We're holding the nest_lock, which serializes this lock's
		 * nesting behaviour.
		 */
		if (nest)
			return 2;

		return print_deadlock_bug(curr, prev, next);
	}
	return 1;
}

/*
 * There was a chain-cache miss, and we are about to add a new dependency
 * to a previous lock. We recursively validate the following rules:
 *
 *  - would the adding of the <prev> -> <next> dependency create a
 *    circular dependency in the graph? [== circular deadlock]
 *
 *  - does the new prev->next dependency connect any hardirq-safe lock
 *    (in the full backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>) with any
 *    hardirq-unsafe lock (in the full forwards-subgraph starting at
 *    <next>)? [== illegal lock inversion with hardirq contexts]
 *
 *  - does the new prev->next dependency connect any softirq-safe lock
 *    (in the full backwards-subgraph starting at <prev>) with any
 *    softirq-unsafe lock (in the full forwards-subgraph starting at
 *    <next>)? [== illegal lock inversion with softirq contexts]
 *
 * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock.
 *
 * Then if all the validations pass, we add the forwards and backwards
 * dependency.
 */
static int
check_prev_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *prev,
	       struct held_lock *next, int distance)
{
	struct lock_list *entry;
	int ret;
	struct lock_list this;
	struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);

	/*
	 * Prove that the new <prev> -> <next> dependency would not
	 * create a circular dependency in the graph. (We do this by
	 * forward-recursing into the graph starting at <next>, and
	 * checking whether we can reach <prev>.)
	 *
	 * We are using global variables to control the recursion, to
	 * keep the stackframe size of the recursive functions low:
	 */
	this.class = hlock_class(next);
	this.parent = NULL;
	ret = check_noncircular(&this, hlock_class(prev), &target_entry);
	if (unlikely(!ret))
		return print_circular_bug(&this, target_entry, next, prev);
	else if (unlikely(ret < 0))
		return print_bfs_bug(ret);

	if (!check_prev_add_irq(curr, prev, next))
		return 0;

	/*
	 * For recursive read-locks we do all the dependency checks,
	 * but we dont store read-triggered dependencies (only
	 * write-triggered dependencies). This ensures that only the
	 * write-side dependencies matter, and that if for example a
	 * write-lock never takes any other locks, then the reads are
	 * equivalent to a NOP.
	 */
	if (next->read == 2 || prev->read == 2)
		return 1;
	/*
	 * Is the <prev> -> <next> dependency already present?
	 *
	 * (this may occur even though this is a new chain: consider
	 *  e.g. the L1 -> L2 -> L3 -> L4 and the L5 -> L1 -> L2 -> L3
	 *  chains - the second one will be new, but L1 already has
	 *  L2 added to its dependency list, due to the first chain.)
	 */
	list_for_each_entry(entry, &hlock_class(prev)->locks_after, entry) {
		if (entry->class == hlock_class(next)) {
			if (distance == 1)
				entry->distance = 1;
			return 2;
		}
	}

	/*
	 * Ok, all validations passed, add the new lock
	 * to the previous lock's dependency list:
	 */
	ret = add_lock_to_list(hlock_class(prev), hlock_class(next),
			       &hlock_class(prev)->locks_after,
			       next->acquire_ip, distance);

	if (!ret)
		return 0;

	ret = add_lock_to_list(hlock_class(next), hlock_class(prev),
			       &hlock_class(next)->locks_before,
			       next->acquire_ip, distance);
	if (!ret)
		return 0;

	/*
	 * Debugging printouts:
	 */
	if (verbose(hlock_class(prev)) || verbose(hlock_class(next))) {
		graph_unlock();
		printk("\n new dependency: ");
		print_lock_name(hlock_class(prev));
		printk(" => ");
		print_lock_name(hlock_class(next));
		printk("\n");
		dump_stack();
		return graph_lock();
	}
	return 1;
}

/*
 * Add the dependency to all directly-previous locks that are 'relevant'.
 * The ones that are relevant are (in increasing distance from curr):
 * all consecutive trylock entries and the final non-trylock entry - or
 * the end of this context's lock-chain - whichever comes first.
 */
static int
check_prevs_add(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *next)
{
	int depth = curr->lockdep_depth;
	struct held_lock *hlock;

	/*
	 * Debugging checks.
	 *
	 * Depth must not be zero for a non-head lock:
	 */
	if (!depth)
		goto out_bug;
	/*
	 * At least two relevant locks must exist for this
	 * to be a head:
	 */
	if (curr->held_locks[depth].irq_context !=
			curr->held_locks[depth-1].irq_context)
		goto out_bug;

	for (;;) {
		int distance = curr->lockdep_depth - depth + 1;
		hlock = curr->held_locks + depth-1;
		/*
		 * Only non-recursive-read entries get new dependencies
		 * added:
		 */
		if (hlock->read != 2) {
			if (!check_prev_add(curr, hlock, next, distance))
				return 0;
			/*
			 * Stop after the first non-trylock entry,
			 * as non-trylock entries have added their
			 * own direct dependencies already, so this
			 * lock is connected to them indirectly:
			 */
			if (!hlock->trylock)
				break;
		}
		depth--;
		/*
		 * End of lock-stack?
		 */
		if (!depth)
			break;
		/*
		 * Stop the search if we cross into another context:
		 */
		if (curr->held_locks[depth].irq_context !=
				curr->held_locks[depth-1].irq_context)
			break;
	}
	return 1;
out_bug:
	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
		return 0;

	WARN_ON(1);

	return 0;
}

unsigned long nr_lock_chains;
struct lock_chain lock_chains[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS];
int nr_chain_hlocks;
static u16 chain_hlocks[MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS];

struct lock_class *lock_chain_get_class(struct lock_chain *chain, int i)
{
	return lock_classes + chain_hlocks[chain->base + i];
}

/*
 * Look up a dependency chain. If the key is not present yet then
 * add it and return 1 - in this case the new dependency chain is
 * validated. If the key is already hashed, return 0.
 * (On return with 1 graph_lock is held.)
 */
static inline int lookup_chain_cache(struct task_struct *curr,
				     struct held_lock *hlock,
				     u64 chain_key)
{
	struct lock_class *class = hlock_class(hlock);
	struct list_head *hash_head = chainhashentry(chain_key);
	struct lock_chain *chain;
	struct held_lock *hlock_curr, *hlock_next;
	int i, j, n, cn;

	if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(!irqs_disabled()))
		return 0;
	/*
	 * We can walk it lock-free, because entries only get added
	 * to the hash:
	 */
	list_for_each_entry(chain, hash_head, entry) {
		if (chain->chain_key == chain_key) {
cache_hit:
			debug_atomic_inc(&chain_lookup_hits);
			if (very_verbose(class))
				printk("\nhash chain already cached, key: "
					"%016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
					(unsigned long long)chain_key,
					class->key, class->name);
			return 0;
		}
	}
	if (very_verbose(class))
		printk("\nnew hash chain, key: %016Lx tail class: [%p] %s\n",
			(unsigned long long)chain_key, class->key, class->name);
	/*
	 * Allocate a new chain entry from the static array, and add
	 * it to the hash:
	 */
	if (!graph_lock())
		return 0;
	/*
	 * We have to walk the chain again locked - to avoid duplicates:
	 */
	list_for_each_entry(chain, hash_head, entry) {
		if (chain->chain_key == chain_key) {
			graph_unlock();
			goto cache_hit;
		}
	}
	if (unlikely(nr_lock_chains >= MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS)) {
		if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock())
			return 0;

		printk("BUG: MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAINS too low!\n");
		printk("turning off the locking correctness validator.\n");
		dump_stack();
		return 0;
	}
	chain = lock_chains + nr_lock_chains++;
	chain->chain_key = chain_key;
	chain->irq_context = hlock->irq_context;
	/* Find the first held_lock of current chain */
	hlock_next = hlock;
	for (i = curr->lockdep_depth - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
		hlock_curr = curr->held_locks + i;
		if (hlock_curr->irq_context != hlock_next->irq_context)
			break;
		hlock_next = hlock;
	}
	i++;
	chain->depth = curr->lockdep_depth + 1 - i;
	cn = nr_chain_hlocks;
	while (cn + chain->depth <= MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS) {
		n = cmpxchg(&nr_chain_hlocks, cn, cn + chain->depth);
		if (n == cn)
			break;
		cn = n;
	}
	if (likely(cn + chain->depth <= MAX_LOCKDEP_CHAIN_HLOCKS)) {
		chain->base = cn;
		for (j = 0; j < chain->depth - 1; j++, i++) {
			int lock_id = curr->held_locks[i].class_idx - 1;
			chain_hlocks[chain->base + j] = lock_id;
		}
		chain_hlocks[chain->base + j] = class - lock_classes;
	}
	list_add_tail_rcu(&chain->entry, hash_head);
	debug_atomic_inc(&chain_lookup_misses);
	inc_chains();

	return 1;
}

static int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr, struct lockdep_map *lock,
		struct held_lock *hlock, int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
{
	/*
	 * Trylock needs to maintain the stack of held locks, but it
	 * does not add new dependencies, because trylock can be done
	 * in any order.
	 *
	 * We look up the chain_key and do the O(N^2) check and update of
	 * the dependencies only if this is a new dependency chain.
	 * (If lookup_chain_cache() returns with 1 it acquires
	 * graph_lock for us)
	 */
	if (!hlock->trylock && (hlock->check == 2) &&
	    lookup_chain_cache(curr, hlock, chain_key)) {
		/*
		 * Check whether last held lock:
		 *
		 * - is irq-safe, if this lock is irq-unsafe
		 * - is softirq-safe, if this lock is hardirq-unsafe
		 *
		 * And check whether the new lock's dependency graph
		 * could lead back to the previous lock.
		 *
		 * any of these scenarios could lead to a deadlock. If
		 * All validations
		 */
		int ret = check_deadlock(curr, hlock, lock, hlock->read);

		if (!ret)
			return 0;
		/*
		 * Mark recursive read, as we jump over it when
		 * building dependencies (just like we jump over
		 * trylock entries):
		 */
		if (ret == 2)
			hlock->read = 2;
		/*
		 * Add dependency only if this lock is not the head
		 * of the chain, and if it's not a secondary read-lock:
		 */
		if (!chain_head && ret != 2)
			if (!check_prevs_add(curr, hlock))
				return 0;
		graph_unlock();
	} else
		/* after lookup_chain_cache(): */
		if (unlikely(!debug_locks))
			return 0;

	return 1;
}
#else
static inline int validate_chain(struct task_struct *curr,
	       	struct lockdep_map *lock, struct held_lock *hlock,
		int chain_head, u64 chain_key)
{
	return 1;
}
#endif

/*
 * We are building curr_chain_key incrementally, so double-check
 * it from scratch, to make sure that it's done correctly:
 */
static void check_chain_key(struct task_struct *curr)
{
#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCKDEP
	struct held_lock *hlock, *prev_hlock = NULL;
	unsigned int i, id;
	u64 chain_key = 0;

	for (i = 0; i < curr->lockdep_depth; i++) {
		hlock = curr->held_locks + i;
		if (chain_key != hlock->prev_chain_key) {
			debug_locks_off();
			WARN(1, "hm#1, depth: %u [%u], %016Lx != %016Lx\n",
				curr->lockdep_depth, i,
				(unsigned long long)chain_key,
				(unsigned long long)hlock->prev_chain_key);
			return;
		}
		id = hlock->class_idx - 1;
		if (DEBUG_LOCKS_WARN_ON(id >= MAX_LOCKDEP_KEYS))
			return;

		if (prev_hlock && (prev_hlock->irq_context !=
							hlock->irq_context))
			chain_key = 0;
		chain_key = iterate_chain_key(chain_key, id);
		prev_hlock = hlock;
	}
	if (chain_key != curr->curr_chain_key) {
		debug_locks_off();
		WARN(1, "hm#2, depth: %u [%u], %016Lx != %016Lx\n",
			curr->lockdep_depth, i,
			(unsigned long long)chain_key,
			(unsigned long long)curr->curr_chain_key);
	}
#endif
}

static int
print_usage_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
		enum lock_usage_bit prev_bit, enum lock_usage_bit new_bit)
{
	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
		return 0;

	printk("\n=================================\n");
	printk(  "[ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]\n");
	print_kernel_version();
	printk(  "---------------------------------\n");

	printk("inconsistent {%s} -> {%s} usage.\n",
		usage_str[prev_bit], usage_str[new_bit]);

	printk("%s/%d [HC%u[%lu]:SC%u[%lu]:HE%u:SE%u] takes:\n",
		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr),
		trace_hardirq_context(curr), hardirq_count() >> HARDIRQ_SHIFT,
		trace_softirq_context(curr), softirq_count() >> SOFTIRQ_SHIFT,
		trace_hardirqs_enabled(curr),
		trace_softirqs_enabled(curr));
	print_lock(this);

	printk("{%s} state was registered at:\n", usage_str[prev_bit]);
	print_stack_trace(hlock_class(this)->usage_traces + prev_bit, 1);

	print_irqtrace_events(curr);
	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);

	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
	dump_stack();

	return 0;
}

/*
 * Print out an error if an invalid bit is set:
 */
static inline int
valid_state(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
	    enum lock_usage_bit new_bit, enum lock_usage_bit bad_bit)
{
	if (unlikely(hlock_class(this)->usage_mask & (1 << bad_bit)))
		return print_usage_bug(curr, this, bad_bit, new_bit);
	return 1;
}

static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
		     enum lock_usage_bit new_bit);

#if defined(CONFIG_TRACE_IRQFLAGS) && defined(CONFIG_PROVE_LOCKING)

/*
 * print irq inversion bug:
 */
static int
print_irq_inversion_bug(struct task_struct *curr, struct lock_class *other,
			struct held_lock *this, int forwards,
			const char *irqclass)
{
	if (!debug_locks_off_graph_unlock() || debug_locks_silent)
		return 0;

	printk("\n=========================================================\n");
	printk(  "[ INFO: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected ]\n");
	print_kernel_version();
	printk(  "---------------------------------------------------------\n");
	printk("%s/%d just changed the state of lock:\n",
		curr->comm, task_pid_nr(curr));
	print_lock(this);
	if (forwards)
		printk("but this lock took another, %s-unsafe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
	else
		printk("but this lock was taken by another, %s-safe lock in the past:\n", irqclass);
	print_lock_name(other);
	printk("\n\nand interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them.\n\n");

	printk("\nother info that might help us debug this:\n");
	lockdep_print_held_locks(curr);

	printk("\nthe first lock's dependencies:\n");
	print_lock_dependencies(hlock_class(this), 0);

	printk("\nthe second lock's dependencies:\n");
	print_lock_dependencies(other, 0);

	printk("\nstack backtrace:\n");
	dump_stack();

	return 0;
}

/*
 * Prove that in the forwards-direction subgraph starting at <this>
 * there is no lock matching <mask>:
 */
static int
check_usage_forwards(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
		     enum lock_usage_bit bit, const char *irqclass)
{
	int ret;
	struct lock_list root;
	struct lock_list *uninitialized_var(target_entry);

	root.parent = NULL;
	root.class = hlock_class(this);
	ret = find_usage_forwards(&root, bit, &target_entry);
	BFS_PROCESS_RET(ret);

	return print_irq_inversion_bug(curr, target_entry->class,