SuperH IrDA: correct Baud rate error correction

It looks to me as if the second value of rate_err_array is intended
to be a decimal 625. However, with a leading 0 it becomes an octal
constant, and as such evaluates to a decimal 405.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Kaiser <nikai@nikai.net>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>