[libata] Improve timeout handling
On a timeout call a device specific handler early in the recovery so that we can complete and process successful commands which timed out due to IRQ loss or the like rather more elegantly. [Revised to exclude the timeout handling on a few devices that inherit from SFF but are not SFF enough to use the default timeout handler] Signed-off-by:Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by:
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@redhat.com>
Showing
- drivers/ata/libata-eh.c 17 additions, 2 deletionsdrivers/ata/libata-eh.c
- drivers/ata/libata-sff.c 45 additions, 1 deletiondrivers/ata/libata-sff.c
- drivers/ata/pata_isapnp.c 10 additions, 2 deletionsdrivers/ata/pata_isapnp.c
- drivers/ata/pdc_adma.c 2 additions, 0 deletionsdrivers/ata/pdc_adma.c
- drivers/ata/sata_mv.c 2 additions, 0 deletionsdrivers/ata/sata_mv.c
- drivers/ata/sata_nv.c 1 addition, 0 deletionsdrivers/ata/sata_nv.c
- drivers/ata/sata_promise.c 2 additions, 0 deletionsdrivers/ata/sata_promise.c
- drivers/ata/sata_qstor.c 1 addition, 0 deletionsdrivers/ata/sata_qstor.c
- drivers/ata/sata_vsc.c 3 additions, 0 deletionsdrivers/ata/sata_vsc.c
- include/linux/libata.h 2 additions, 0 deletionsinclude/linux/libata.h
Loading
Please register or sign in to comment