Commit 1097f5e9 authored by Michael Chan's avatar Michael Chan Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

[BNX2]: Fix minor bug in bnx2_has_work().



It is more correct to get the status block from the bnx2_napi struct
instead of the bnx2 struct.  It happens that they are the same in this
case because we are using the first MSIX vector.
Signed-off-by: default avatarMichael Chan <mchan@broadcom.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent 2dd201d7
......@@ -2903,8 +2903,7 @@ bnx2_tx_msix(int irq, void *dev_instance)
static inline int
bnx2_has_work(struct bnx2_napi *bnapi)
{
struct bnx2 *bp = bnapi->bp;
struct status_block *sblk = bp->status_blk;
struct status_block *sblk = bnapi->status_blk;
if ((bnx2_get_hw_rx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->rx_cons) ||
(bnx2_get_hw_tx_cons(bnapi) != bnapi->hw_tx_cons))
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment