Commit 042c53f6 authored by Christian Lamparter's avatar Christian Lamparter Committed by John W. Linville
Browse files

carl9170: remove lost-frame workaround



This patch removes some cruft, which survived
the RFC review phase.

Originally, carl9170_tx_ampdu_queue erroneously
dropped a lot of frames. As a result the ampdu
scheduler bogged down quite frequently and the
affected BA session timed out.

However this bug has been fixed and the WA and
its debugfs counter is no longer useful.
Signed-off-by: default avatarChristian Lamparter <chunkeey@googlemail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn W. Linville <linville@tuxdriver.com>
parent b4c85d45
......@@ -364,7 +364,6 @@ struct ar9170 {
unsigned int tx_dropped;
unsigned int tx_ack_failures;
unsigned int tx_fcs_errors;
unsigned int tx_ampdu_timeout;
unsigned int rx_dropped;
/* EEPROM */
......
......@@ -798,8 +798,6 @@ DEBUGFS_READONLY_FILE(tx_total_queued, 20, "%d",
atomic_read(&ar->tx_total_queued));
DEBUGFS_READONLY_FILE(tx_ampdu_scheduler, 20, "%d",
atomic_read(&ar->tx_ampdu_scheduler));
DEBUGFS_READONLY_FILE(tx_ampdu_timeout, 20, "%d",
ar->tx_ampdu_timeout);
DEBUGFS_READONLY_FILE(tx_total_pending, 20, "%d",
atomic_read(&ar->tx_total_pending));
......@@ -872,8 +870,6 @@ void carl9170_debugfs_register(struct ar9170 *ar)
DEBUGFS_ADD(ampdu_density);
DEBUGFS_ADD(ampdu_factor);
DEBUGFS_ADD(tx_ampdu_timeout);
DEBUGFS_ADD(tx_janitor_last_run);
DEBUGFS_ADD(tx_status_0);
......
......@@ -1042,41 +1042,8 @@ retry:
queue = TID_TO_WME_AC(tid_info->tid);
spin_lock_bh(&tid_info->lock);
if (tid_info->state != CARL9170_TID_STATE_XMIT) {
first = skb_peek(&tid_info->queue);
if (first) {
struct ieee80211_tx_info *txinfo;
struct carl9170_tx_info *arinfo;
txinfo = IEEE80211_SKB_CB(first);
arinfo = (void *) txinfo->rate_driver_data;
if (time_is_after_jiffies(arinfo->timeout +
msecs_to_jiffies(CARL9170_QUEUE_TIMEOUT))
== true)
goto processed;
/*
* We've been waiting for the frame which
* matches "snx" (start sequence of the
* next aggregate) for some time now.
*
* But it never arrived. Therefore
* jump to the next available frame
* and kick-start the transmission.
*
* Note: This might induce odd latency
* spikes because the receiver will be
* waiting for the lost frame too.
*/
ar->tx_ampdu_timeout++;
tid_info->snx = carl9170_get_seq(first);
tid_info->state = CARL9170_TID_STATE_XMIT;
} else {
goto processed;
}
}
if (tid_info->state != CARL9170_TID_STATE_XMIT)
goto processed;
tid_info->counter++;
first = skb_peek(&tid_info->queue);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment