Lockdep warning will be trigged while rfcomm connection closing.

The locks taken in rfcomm_dev_add:
rfcomm_dev_lock --> d->lock

In __rfcomm_dlc_close:
d->lock --> rfcomm_dev_lock (in rfcomm_dev_state_change)

There's two way to fix it, one is in rfcomm_dev_add we first locking
d->lock then the rfcomm_dev_lock

The other (in this patch), remove the locking of d->lock for
rfcomm_dev_state_change because just locking "d->state = BT_CLOSED;"
is enough.

[  295.002046] =======================================================
[  295.002046] [ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
[  295.002046] 2.6.25-rc7 #1
[  295.002046] -------------------------------------------------------
[  295.002046] krfcommd/2705 is trying to acquire lock:
[  295.002046]  (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}, at: [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] but task is already holding lock:
[  295.002046]  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] which lock already depends on the new lock.
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is:
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] -> #1 (&d->lock){--..}:
[  295.002046]        [<c0149b23>] check_prev_add+0xd3/0x200
[  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]        [<c03d6b99>] _spin_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]        [<f89a01c0>] rfcomm_dev_add+0x240/0x360 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f89a047e>] rfcomm_create_dev+0x6e/0xe0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f89a0823>] rfcomm_dev_ioctl+0x33/0x60 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899facc>] rfcomm_sock_ioctl+0x2c/0x50 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<c0363d38>] sock_ioctl+0x118/0x240
[  295.002046]        [<c0194196>] vfs_ioctl+0x76/0x90
[  295.002046]        [<c0194446>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x56/0x140
[  295.002046]        [<c0194569>] sys_ioctl+0x39/0x60
[  295.002046]        [<c0104faa>] syscall_call+0x7/0xb
[  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] -> #0 (rfcomm_dev_lock){-.--}:
[  295.002046]        [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
[  295.002046]        [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]        [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]        [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]        [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]        [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]        [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]        [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
[  295.002046]        [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[  295.002046]        [<ffffffff>] 0xffffffff
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] other info that might help us debug this:
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] 2 locks held by krfcommd/2705:
[  295.002046]  #0:  (rfcomm_mutex){--..}, at: [<f899e2eb>] rfcomm_run+0x7b/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  #1:  (&d->lock){--..}, at: [<f899c533>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x43/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046] 
[  295.002046] stack backtrace:
[  295.002046] Pid: 2705, comm: krfcommd Not tainted 2.6.25-rc7 #1
[  295.002046]  [<c0128a38>] ? printk+0x18/0x20
[  295.002046]  [<c014927f>] print_circular_bug_tail+0x6f/0x80
[  295.002046]  [<c0149a84>] check_prev_add+0x34/0x200
[  295.002046]  [<c0149ce5>] check_prevs_add+0x95/0xe0
[  295.002046]  [<c0149f6f>] validate_chain+0x23f/0x320
[  295.002046]  [<c014b7b1>] __lock_acquire+0x1c1/0x760
[  295.002046]  [<c014c349>] lock_acquire+0x79/0xb0
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c03d6639>] _read_lock+0x39/0x80
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] ? rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f89a090a>] rfcomm_dev_state_change+0x6a/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899c548>] __rfcomm_dlc_close+0x58/0xd0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899d44f>] rfcomm_recv_ua+0x6f/0x120 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<f899e061>] rfcomm_recv_frame+0x171/0x1e0 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c014abd9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xb9/0x130
[  295.002046]  [<c03d6e89>] ? _spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x39/0x70
[  295.002046]  [<f899e357>] rfcomm_run+0xe7/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c03d4559>] ? __sched_text_start+0x229/0x4c0
[  295.002046]  [<c0120000>] ? cpu_avg_load_per_task+0x20/0x30
[  295.002046]  [<f899e270>] ? rfcomm_run+0x0/0x550 [rfcomm]
[  295.002046]  [<c013c18c>] kthread+0x5c/0xa0
[  295.002046]  [<c013c130>] ? kthread+0x0/0xa0
[  295.002046]  [<c0105c07>] kernel_thread_helper+0x7/0x10
[  295.002046]  =======================

Signed-off-by: Dave Young <hidave.darkstar@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>