Commit 6a0fcbdf authored by Richard Henderson's avatar Richard Henderson Committed by Peter Maydell

cpu-exec: Do CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT unconditionally

The signal is currently checked by 10 targets, but only actually
raised by Sparc and ARM.  For the sake of one test-and-branch,
we can handle this generic bit generically.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRichard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Message-id: 1410626734-3804-24-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
parent 42f53fea
......@@ -404,17 +404,12 @@ int cpu_exec(CPUArchState *env)
cpu->exception_index = EXCP_DEBUG;
cpu_loop_exit(cpu);
}
#if defined(TARGET_ARM) || defined(TARGET_SPARC) || defined(TARGET_MIPS) || \
defined(TARGET_PPC) || defined(TARGET_ALPHA) || defined(TARGET_CRIS) || \
defined(TARGET_MICROBLAZE) || defined(TARGET_LM32) || \
defined(TARGET_UNICORE32) || defined(TARGET_TRICORE)
if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT) {
cpu->interrupt_request &= ~CPU_INTERRUPT_HALT;
cpu->halted = 1;
cpu->exception_index = EXCP_HLT;
cpu_loop_exit(cpu);
}
#endif
#if defined(TARGET_I386)
if (interrupt_request & CPU_INTERRUPT_INIT) {
cpu_svm_check_intercept_param(env, SVM_EXIT_INIT, 0);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment