1. 10 Dec, 2012 1 commit
    • Linus Torvalds's avatar
      Revert "revert "Revert "mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD""" and associated damage · caf49191
      Linus Torvalds authored
      This reverts commits a5091539 and
      This is a revert of a revert of a revert.  In addition, it reverts the
      even older i915 change to stop using the __GFP_NO_KSWAPD flag due to the
      original commits in linux-next.
      It turns out that the original patch really was bogus, and that the
      original revert was the correct thing to do after all.  We thought we
      had fixed the problem, and then reverted the revert, but the problem
      really is fundamental: waking up kswapd simply isn't the right thing to
      do, and direct reclaim sometimes simply _is_ the right thing to do.
      When certain allocations fail, we simply should try some direct reclaim,
      and if that fails, fail the allocation.  That's the right thing to do
      for THP allocations, which can easily fail, and the GPU allocations want
      to do that too.
      So starting kswapd is sometimes simply wrong, and removing the flag that
      said "don't start kswapd" was a mistake.  Let's hope we never revisit
      this mistake again - and certainly not this many times ;)
      Acked-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Acked-by: default avatarJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
  2. 30 Nov, 2012 1 commit
    • Andrew Morton's avatar
      revert "Revert "mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD"" · a5091539
      Andrew Morton authored
      It apepars that this patch was innocent, and we hope that "mm: avoid
      waking kswapd for THP allocations when compaction is deferred or
      contended" will fix the final kswapd-spinning cause.
      Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
      Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
      Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
  3. 26 Nov, 2012 1 commit
    • Mel Gorman's avatar
      Revert "mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD" · 82b212f4
      Mel Gorman authored
      With "mm: vmscan: scale number of pages reclaimed by reclaim/compaction
      based on failures" reverted, Zdenek Kabelac reported the following
        Hmm,  so it's just took longer to hit the problem and observe
        kswapd0 spinning on my CPU again - it's not as endless like before -
        but still it easily eats minutes - it helps to	turn off  Firefox
        or TB  (memory hungry apps) so kswapd0 stops soon - and restart
        those apps again.  (And I still have like >1GB of cached memory)
        kswapd0         R  running task        0    30      2 0x00000000
        Call Trace:
      The sysrq+m indicates the system has no swap so it'll never reclaim
      anonymous pages as part of reclaim/compaction.  That is one part of the
      problem but not the root cause as file-backed pages could also be
      The likely underlying problem is that kswapd is woken up or kept awake
      for each THP allocation request in the page allocator slow path.
      If compaction fails for the requesting process then compaction will be
      deferred for a time and direct reclaim is avoided.  However, if there
      are a storm of THP requests that are simply rejected, it will still be
      the the case that kswapd is awake for a prolonged period of time as
      pgdat->kswapd_max_order is updated each time.  This is noticed by the
      main kswapd() loop and it will not call kswapd_try_to_sleep().  Instead
      it will loopp, shrinking a small number of pages and calling
      shrink_slab() on each iteration.
      The temptation is to supply a patch that checks if kswapd was woken for
      THP and if so ignore pgdat->kswapd_max_order but it'll be a hack and not
      backed up by proper testing.  As 3.7 is very close to release and this
      is not a bug we should release with, a safer path is to revert "mm:
      remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD" for now and revisit it with the view to ironing
      out the balance_pgdat() logic in general.
      Signed-off-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
      Cc: Zdenek Kabelac <zkabelac@redhat.com>
      Cc: Seth Jennings <sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Cc: Valdis Kletnieks <Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu>
      Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@gmail.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Robert Jennings <rcj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
  4. 09 Oct, 2012 1 commit
  5. 29 Sep, 2012 1 commit
  6. 06 Jul, 2012 1 commit
  7. 13 May, 2012 3 commits
  8. 26 Mar, 2012 10 commits
  9. 30 Jan, 2012 1 commit
  10. 09 Jan, 2012 10 commits
  11. 11 Sep, 2011 6 commits
  12. 24 May, 2011 4 commits