Commit d7c3b937 authored by Sedat Dilek's avatar Sedat Dilek Committed by Daniel Vetter

drm/i915: Remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD

When I pulled-in today's drm-intel-next into linux-next (next-20120824)
I saw this build-breakage:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function 'i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt':
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1778:40: error: '__GFP_NO_KSWAPD' undeclared (first use in this function)
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c:1778:40: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in

This is caused by commit ba099ef165f8 ("mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD")
and commit b6beae2c2014 ("mm: remove __GFP_NO_KSWAPD fixes") in
linux-next (next-20120824).

Fix this by removing __GFP_NO_KSWAPD from drm/i915 driver.
Signed-off-by: default avatarSedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
parent cd7988ee
......@@ -1775,7 +1775,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
/* Fail silently without starting the shrinker */
mapping = obj->base.filp->f_path.dentry->d_inode->i_mapping;
gfp = mapping_gfp_mask(mapping);
gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NO_KSWAPD;
gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
gfp &= ~(__GFP_IO | __GFP_WAIT);
for (i = 0; i < page_count; i++) {
page = shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp(mapping, i, gfp);
......@@ -1788,7 +1788,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
* our own buffer, now let the real VM do its job and
* go down in flames if truly OOM.
*/
gfp &= ~(__GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NO_KSWAPD);
gfp &= ~(__GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN);
gfp |= __GFP_IO | __GFP_WAIT;
i915_gem_shrink_all(dev_priv);
......@@ -1796,7 +1796,7 @@ i915_gem_object_get_pages_gtt(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj)
if (IS_ERR(page))
goto err_pages;
gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN | __GFP_NO_KSWAPD;
gfp |= __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
gfp &= ~(__GFP_IO | __GFP_WAIT);
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment