From c2368e795cec561229ef66a04ac51629b918a9e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Date: Sun, 22 Aug 2010 17:35:32 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] bridge: is PACKET_LOOPBACK unlikely()? While looking at using netdev_rx_handler_register for openvswitch Jesse Gross suggested that an unlikely() might be worthwhile in that code. I'm interested to see if its appropriate for the bridge code. Cc: Jesse Gross <jesse@nicira.com> Signed-off-by: Simon Horman <horms@verge.net.au> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> --- net/bridge/br_input.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/bridge/br_input.c b/net/bridge/br_input.c index 826cd5221536..6d04cfdf4541 100644 --- a/net/bridge/br_input.c +++ b/net/bridge/br_input.c @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ struct sk_buff *br_handle_frame(struct sk_buff *skb) const unsigned char *dest = eth_hdr(skb)->h_dest; int (*rhook)(struct sk_buff *skb); - if (skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK) + if (unlikely(skb->pkt_type == PACKET_LOOPBACK)) return skb; if (!is_valid_ether_addr(eth_hdr(skb)->h_source)) -- GitLab