From beefebf1aa611242e022e71bae87034f415d3314 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 01:01:59 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] ecryptfs_inode_permission() doesn't need to bail out on RCU
... now that inode_permission() can take MAY_NOT_BLOCK and handle it
properly.
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/ecryptfs/inode.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
index bec75f8e91ac..799e01055f22 100644
--- a/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ecryptfs/inode.c
@@ -944,8 +944,6 @@ int ecryptfs_truncate(struct dentry *dentry, loff_t new_length)
static int
ecryptfs_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask)
{
- if (mask & MAY_NOT_BLOCK)
- return -ECHILD;
return inode_permission(ecryptfs_inode_to_lower(inode), mask);
}
--
GitLab