Commit ae55e1aa authored by Tao Ma's avatar Tao Ma Committed by Linus Torvalds
Browse files

fs/direct-io.c: calculate fs_count correctly in get_more_blocks()

In get_more_blocks(), we use dio_count to calcuate fs_count and do some
tricky things to increase fs_count if dio_count isn't aligned.  But
actually it still has some corner cases that can't be coverd.  See the
following example:

	dio_write foo -s 1024 -w 4096

(direct write 4096 bytes at offset 1024).  The same goes if the offset
isn't aligned to fs_blocksize.

In this case, the old calculation counts fs_count to be 1, but actually we
will write into 2 different blocks (if fs_blocksize=4096).  The old code
just works, since it will call get_block twice (and may have to allocate
and create extents twice for filesystems like ext4).  So we'd better call
get_block just once with the proper fs_count.
Signed-off-by: default avatarTao Ma <>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <>
Cc: Al Viro <>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <>
parent 45dac90f
......@@ -580,9 +580,8 @@ static int get_more_blocks(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
int ret;
sector_t fs_startblk; /* Into file, in filesystem-sized blocks */
sector_t fs_endblk; /* Into file, in filesystem-sized blocks */
unsigned long fs_count; /* Number of filesystem-sized blocks */
unsigned long dio_count;/* Number of dio_block-sized blocks */
unsigned long blkmask;
int create;
......@@ -593,11 +592,9 @@ static int get_more_blocks(struct dio *dio, struct dio_submit *sdio,
if (ret == 0) {
BUG_ON(sdio->block_in_file >= sdio->final_block_in_request);
fs_startblk = sdio->block_in_file >> sdio->blkfactor;
dio_count = sdio->final_block_in_request - sdio->block_in_file;
fs_count = dio_count >> sdio->blkfactor;
blkmask = (1 << sdio->blkfactor) - 1;
if (dio_count & blkmask)
fs_endblk = (sdio->final_block_in_request - 1) >>
fs_count = fs_endblk - fs_startblk + 1;
map_bh->b_state = 0;
map_bh->b_size = fs_count << dio->inode->i_blkbits;
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment