Commit a6963a6b authored by Ilpo Järvinen's avatar Ilpo Järvinen Committed by David S. Miller
Browse files

[TCP]: Re-place highest_sack check to a more robust position

I previously added checking to position that is rather poor as
state has already been adjusted quite a bit. Re-placing it above
all state changes should be more robust though the return should
never ever get executed regardless of its place :-).
Signed-off-by: default avatarIlpo Järvinen <>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <>
parent b0d045ca
......@@ -1718,6 +1718,10 @@ static void tcp_retrans_try_collapse(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int m
BUG_ON(tcp_skb_pcount(skb) != 1 ||
tcp_skb_pcount(next_skb) != 1);
if (WARN_ON(tp->sacked_out &&
(TCP_SKB_CB(next_skb)->seq == tp->highest_sack)))
/* Ok. We will be able to collapse the packet. */
tcp_unlink_write_queue(next_skb, sk);
......@@ -1734,10 +1738,6 @@ static void tcp_retrans_try_collapse(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, int m
/* Update sequence range on original skb. */
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq = TCP_SKB_CB(next_skb)->end_seq;
if (WARN_ON(tp->sacked_out &&
(TCP_SKB_CB(next_skb)->seq == tp->highest_sack)))
/* Merge over control information. */
flags |= TCP_SKB_CB(next_skb)->flags; /* This moves PSH/FIN etc. over */
TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->flags = flags;
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment