Commit 8d63d99a authored by Kirill A. Shutemov's avatar Kirill A. Shutemov Committed by Linus Torvalds

mm: avoid tail page refcounting on non-THP compound pages

THP uses tail page refcounting to be able to split huge pages at any time.
 Tail page refcounting is not needed for other users of compound pages and
it's harmful because of overhead.

We try to exclude non-THP pages from tail page refcounting using
__compound_tail_refcounted() check.  It excludes most common non-THP
compound pages: SL*B and hugetlb, but it doesn't catch rest of __GFP_COMP
users -- drivers.

And it's not only about overhead.

Drivers might want to use compound pages to get refcounting semantics
suitable for mapping high-order pages to userspace.  But tail page
refcounting breaks it.

Tail page refcounting uses ->_mapcount in tail pages to store GUP pins on
them.  It means GUP pins would affect page_mapcount() for tail pages.
It's not a problem for THP, because it never maps tail pages.  But unlike
THP, drivers map parts of compound pages with PTEs and it makes
page_mapcount() be called for tail pages.

In particular, GUP pins would shift PSS up and affect /proc/kpagecount for
such pages.  But, I'm not aware about anything which can lead to crash or
other serious misbehaviour.

Since currently all THP pages are anonymous and all drivers pages are not,
we can fix the __compound_tail_refcounted() check by requiring PageAnon()
to enable tail page refcounting.
Signed-off-by: default avatarKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: default avatarHugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent e8c6158f
......@@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static inline int page_count(struct page *page)
static inline bool __compound_tail_refcounted(struct page *page)
{
return !PageSlab(page) && !PageHeadHuge(page);
return PageAnon(page) && !PageSlab(page) && !PageHeadHuge(page);
}
/*
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment