Commit 7bd88308 authored by Eric W. Biederman's avatar Eric W. Biederman Committed by Tejun Heo

cgroupns: Fix the locking in copy_cgroup_ns

If "clone(CLONE_NEWCGROUP...)" is called it results in a nice lockdep
valid splat.

In __cgroup_proc_write the lock ordering is:
     cgroup_mutex -- through cgroup_kn_lock_live
     cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem

In copy_process the guts of clone the lock ordering is:
     cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem -- through threadgroup_change_begin
     cgroup_mutex -- through copy_namespaces -- copy_cgroup_ns

lockdep reports some a different call chains for the first ordering of
cgroup_mutex and cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem but it is harder to trace.
This is most definitely deadlock potential under the right
circumstances.

Fix this by by skipping the cgroup_mutex and making the locking in
copy_cgroup_ns mirror the locking in cgroup_post_fork which also runs
during fork under the cgroup_threadgroup_rwsem.

Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Fixes: a79a908f ("cgroup: introduce cgroup namespaces")
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
parent 82d6489d
......@@ -6309,14 +6309,11 @@ struct cgroup_namespace *copy_cgroup_ns(unsigned long flags,
if (!ns_capable(user_ns, CAP_SYS_ADMIN))
return ERR_PTR(-EPERM);
mutex_lock(&cgroup_mutex);
/* It is not safe to take cgroup_mutex here */
spin_lock_irq(&css_set_lock);
cset = task_css_set(current);
get_css_set(cset);
spin_unlock_irq(&css_set_lock);
mutex_unlock(&cgroup_mutex);
new_ns = alloc_cgroup_ns();
if (IS_ERR(new_ns)) {
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment