Commit 6d49dab8 authored by Linus Torvalds's avatar Linus Torvalds
Browse files

ipc: move rcu_read_unlock() out of sem_unlock() and into callers



The IPC locking is a mess, and sem_unlock() unlocks not only the
semaphore spinlock, it also drops the rcu read lock.  Unlike sem_lock(),
which just gets the spin-lock, and expects the caller to get the rcu
read lock.

This all makes things very hard to follow, and it's very confusing when
you take the rcu read lock in one function, and then release it in
another.  And it has caused actual bugs: the sem_obtain_lock() function
ended up dropping the RCU read lock twice in one error path, because it
first did the sem_unlock(), and then did a rcu_read_unlock() to match
the rcu_read_lock() it had done.

This is just a totally mindless "remove rcu_read_unlock() from
sem_unlock() and add it immediately after each caller" (except for the
aforementioned bug where we did too many rcu_read_unlock(), and in
find_alloc_undo() where we just got the rcu_read_lock() to correct for
the fact that sem_unlock would immediately drop it again).

We can (and should) clean things up further, but this fixes the bug with
the minimal amount of subtlety.
Reviewed-by: default avatarDavidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@hp.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent ce857229
......@@ -264,7 +264,6 @@ static inline void sem_unlock(struct sem_array *sma, int locknum)
struct sem *sem = sma->sem_base + locknum;
spin_unlock(&sem->lock);
}
rcu_read_unlock();
}
/*
......@@ -332,6 +331,7 @@ static inline void sem_putref(struct sem_array *sma)
{
sem_lock_and_putref(sma);
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
static inline void sem_rmid(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct sem_array *s)
......@@ -435,6 +435,7 @@ static int newary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct ipc_params *params)
sma->sem_nsems = nsems;
sma->sem_ctime = get_seconds();
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
return sma->sem_perm.id;
}
......@@ -874,6 +875,7 @@ static void freeary(struct ipc_namespace *ns, struct kern_ipc_perm *ipcp)
/* Remove the semaphore set from the IDR */
sem_rmid(ns, sma);
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
wake_up_sem_queue_do(&tasks);
ns->used_sems -= sma->sem_nsems;
......@@ -1055,6 +1057,7 @@ static int semctl_setval(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
/* maybe some queued-up processes were waiting for this */
do_smart_update(sma, NULL, 0, 0, &tasks);
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
wake_up_sem_queue_do(&tasks);
return 0;
}
......@@ -1104,10 +1107,12 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
if(nsems > SEMMSL_FAST) {
if (!ipc_rcu_getref(sma)) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
err = -EIDRM;
goto out_free;
}
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
sem_io = ipc_alloc(sizeof(ushort)*nsems);
if(sem_io == NULL) {
sem_putref(sma);
......@@ -1117,6 +1122,7 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
sem_lock_and_putref(sma);
if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
err = -EIDRM;
goto out_free;
}
......@@ -1124,6 +1130,7 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
for (i = 0; i < sma->sem_nsems; i++)
sem_io[i] = sma->sem_base[i].semval;
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
err = 0;
if(copy_to_user(array, sem_io, nsems*sizeof(ushort)))
err = -EFAULT;
......@@ -1164,6 +1171,7 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
sem_lock_and_putref(sma);
if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
err = -EIDRM;
goto out_free;
}
......@@ -1210,6 +1218,7 @@ static int semctl_main(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid, int semnum,
out_unlock:
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
out_wakeup:
wake_up_sem_queue_do(&tasks);
out_free:
......@@ -1295,6 +1304,7 @@ static int semctl_down(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid,
out_unlock:
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
out_up:
up_write(&sem_ids(ns).rw_mutex);
return err;
......@@ -1443,9 +1453,11 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid)
}
/* step 3: Acquire the lock on semaphore array */
/* This also does the rcu_read_lock() */
sem_lock_and_putref(sma);
if (sma->sem_perm.deleted) {
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
kfree(new);
un = ERR_PTR(-EIDRM);
goto out;
......@@ -1472,7 +1484,6 @@ static struct sem_undo *find_alloc_undo(struct ipc_namespace *ns, int semid)
success:
spin_unlock(&ulp->lock);
rcu_read_lock();
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
out:
return un;
......@@ -1648,6 +1659,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE4(semtimedop, int, semid, struct sembuf __user *, tsops,
sleep_again:
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
sem_unlock(sma, locknum);
rcu_read_unlock();
if (timeout)
jiffies_left = schedule_timeout(jiffies_left);
......@@ -1709,6 +1721,7 @@ sleep_again:
out_unlock_free:
sem_unlock(sma, locknum);
rcu_read_unlock();
out_wakeup:
wake_up_sem_queue_do(&tasks);
out_free:
......@@ -1801,6 +1814,7 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
* exactly the same semid. Nothing to do.
*/
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
continue;
}
......@@ -1841,6 +1855,7 @@ void exit_sem(struct task_struct *tsk)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&tasks);
do_smart_update(sma, NULL, 0, 1, &tasks);
sem_unlock(sma, -1);
rcu_read_unlock();
wake_up_sem_queue_do(&tasks);
kfree_rcu(un, rcu);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment