Commit 614c6cb4 authored by Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo's avatar Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Committed by David S. Miller

[SOCK]: Rename __tcp_v4_rehash to __sk_prot_rehash

This operation was already generic and DCCP will use it.
Signed-off-by: default avatarArnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@ghostprotocols.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
parent e6848976
......@@ -612,6 +612,15 @@ static __inline__ void sock_prot_dec_use(struct proto *prot)
prot->stats[smp_processor_id()].inuse--;
}
/* With per-bucket locks this operation is not-atomic, so that
* this version is not worse.
*/
static inline void __sk_prot_rehash(struct sock *sk)
{
sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);
}
/* About 10 seconds */
#define SOCK_DESTROY_TIME (10*HZ)
......
......@@ -1834,15 +1834,6 @@ do_time_wait:
goto discard_it;
}
/* With per-bucket locks this operation is not-atomic, so that
* this version is not worse.
*/
static void __tcp_v4_rehash(struct sock *sk)
{
sk->sk_prot->unhash(sk);
sk->sk_prot->hash(sk);
}
static int tcp_v4_reselect_saddr(struct sock *sk)
{
struct inet_sock *inet = inet_sk(sk);
......@@ -1889,7 +1880,7 @@ static int tcp_v4_reselect_saddr(struct sock *sk)
* Besides that, it does not check for connection
* uniqueness. Wait for troubles.
*/
__tcp_v4_rehash(sk);
__sk_prot_rehash(sk);
return 0;
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment