Commit 4f05028f authored by Ryusuke Konishi's avatar Ryusuke Konishi Committed by Linus Torvalds

nilfs2: fix gcc uninitialized-variable warnings in powerpc build

Some false positive warnings are reported for powerpc build.

The following warnings are reported in
 http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12519703/

   CC      fs/nilfs2/super.o
 fs/nilfs2/super.c: In function 'nilfs_resize_fs':
 fs/nilfs2/super.c:376:2: warning: 'blocknr' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 fs/nilfs2/super.c:362:11: note: 'blocknr' was declared here
   CC      fs/nilfs2/recovery.o
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c: In function 'nilfs_salvage_orphan_logs':
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c:631:21: warning: 'sum' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c:585:32: note: 'sum' was declared here
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c: In function 'nilfs_search_super_root':
 fs/nilfs2/recovery.c:873:11: warning: 'sum' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]

Another similar warning is reported in
 http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/12520079/

   CC      fs/nilfs2/btree.o
 fs/nilfs2/btree.c: In function 'nilfs_btree_convert_and_insert':
 include/asm-generic/bitops/non-atomic.h:105:20: warning: 'bh' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
 fs/nilfs2/btree.c:1859:22: note: 'bh' was declared here

This cleans out these warnings by forcing the variables to be initialized.
Signed-off-by: default avatarRyusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Reported-by: default avatarGeert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
parent 09ef29e0
......@@ -1851,7 +1851,7 @@ int nilfs_btree_convert_and_insert(struct nilfs_bmap *btree,
__u64 key, __u64 ptr,
const __u64 *keys, const __u64 *ptrs, int n)
{
struct buffer_head *bh;
struct buffer_head *bh = NULL;
union nilfs_bmap_ptr_req dreq, nreq, *di, *ni;
struct nilfs_bmap_stats stats;
int ret;
......
......@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static int nilfs_do_roll_forward(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
struct nilfs_recovery_info *ri)
{
struct buffer_head *bh_sum = NULL;
struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum;
struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum = NULL;
sector_t pseg_start;
sector_t seg_start, seg_end; /* Starting/ending DBN of full segment */
unsigned long nsalvaged_blocks = 0;
......@@ -814,7 +814,7 @@ int nilfs_search_super_root(struct the_nilfs *nilfs,
struct nilfs_recovery_info *ri)
{
struct buffer_head *bh_sum = NULL;
struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum;
struct nilfs_segment_summary *sum = NULL;
sector_t pseg_start, pseg_end, sr_pseg_start = 0;
sector_t seg_start, seg_end; /* range of full segment (block number) */
sector_t b, end;
......
......@@ -361,7 +361,7 @@ static int nilfs_move_2nd_super(struct super_block *sb, loff_t sb2off)
struct nilfs_super_block *nsbp;
sector_t blocknr, newblocknr;
unsigned long offset;
int sb2i = -1; /* array index of the secondary superblock */
int sb2i; /* array index of the secondary superblock */
int ret = 0;
/* nilfs->ns_sem must be locked by the caller. */
......@@ -372,6 +372,9 @@ static int nilfs_move_2nd_super(struct super_block *sb, loff_t sb2off)
} else if (nilfs->ns_sbh[0]->b_blocknr > nilfs->ns_first_data_block) {
sb2i = 0;
blocknr = nilfs->ns_sbh[0]->b_blocknr;
} else {
sb2i = -1;
blocknr = 0;
}
if (sb2i >= 0 && (u64)blocknr << nilfs->ns_blocksize_bits == sb2off)
goto out; /* super block location is unchanged */
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment