Commit 419d4741 authored by Borislav Petkov's avatar Borislav Petkov Committed by Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz

ide-tape: make function name more accurate

idetape_active_next_stage() was rather ambiguous wrt its purpose. Make that
more explicit and remove superfluous comment.
Signed-off-by: default avatarBorislav Petkov <bbpetkov@yahoo.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
parent fa36625b
......@@ -846,10 +846,7 @@ static void idetape_analyze_error(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 *sense)
}
}
/*
* idetape_active_next_stage will declare the next stage as "active".
*/
static void idetape_active_next_stage (ide_drive_t *drive)
static void idetape_activate_next_stage(ide_drive_t *drive)
{
idetape_tape_t *tape = drive->driver_data;
idetape_stage_t *stage = tape->next_stage;
......@@ -1040,7 +1037,7 @@ static int idetape_end_request(ide_drive_t *drive, int uptodate, int nr_sects)
}
}
if (tape->next_stage != NULL) {
idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
/*
* Insert the next request into the request queue.
......@@ -2414,7 +2411,7 @@ static void idetape_insert_pipeline_into_queue (ide_drive_t *drive)
return;
if (!idetape_pipeline_active(tape)) {
set_bit(IDETAPE_PIPELINE_ACTIVE, &tape->flags);
idetape_active_next_stage(drive);
idetape_activate_next_stage(drive);
(void) ide_do_drive_cmd(drive, tape->active_data_request, ide_end);
}
}
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment