Commit 3ff6dcac authored by Yong Zhang's avatar Yong Zhang Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

sched: Fix poor interactivity on UP systems due to group scheduler nice tune bug



Michael Witten and Christian Kujau reported that the autogroup
scheduling feature hurts interactivity on their UP systems.

It turns out that this is an older bug in the group scheduling code,
and the wider appeal provided by the autogroup feature exposed it
more prominently.

When on UP with FAIR_GROUP_SCHED enabled, tune shares
only affect tg->shares, but is not reflected in
tg->se->load. The reason is that update_cfs_shares()
does nothing on UP.

So introduce update_cfs_shares() for UP && FAIR_GROUP_SCHED.

This issue was found when enable autogroup scheduling was enabled,
but it is an older bug that also exists on cgroup.cpu on UP.
Reported-and-Tested-by: default avatarMichael Witten <mfwitten@gmail.com>
Reported-and-Tested-by: default avatarChristian Kujau <christian@nerdbynature.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarYong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com>
Acked-by: default avatarPekka Enberg <penberg@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarMike Galbraith <efault@gmx.de>
Acked-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
LKML-Reference: <20110124073352.GA24186@windriver.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 1bae4ce2
......@@ -699,7 +699,8 @@ account_entity_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
cfs_rq->nr_running--;
}
#if defined CONFIG_SMP && defined CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
#ifdef CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
# ifdef CONFIG_SMP
static void update_cfs_rq_load_contribution(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
int global_update)
{
......@@ -762,6 +763,51 @@ static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int global_update)
list_del_leaf_cfs_rq(cfs_rq);
}
static long calc_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_group *tg,
long weight_delta)
{
long load_weight, load, shares;
load = cfs_rq->load.weight + weight_delta;
load_weight = atomic_read(&tg->load_weight);
load_weight -= cfs_rq->load_contribution;
load_weight += load;
shares = (tg->shares * load);
if (load_weight)
shares /= load_weight;
if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
shares = MIN_SHARES;
if (shares > tg->shares)
shares = tg->shares;
return shares;
}
static void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (cfs_rq->load_unacc_exec_time > sysctl_sched_shares_window) {
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
}
}
# else /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int global_update)
{
}
static inline long calc_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct task_group *tg,
long weight_delta)
{
return tg->shares;
}
static inline void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
}
# endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
unsigned long weight)
{
......@@ -782,7 +828,7 @@ static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long weight_delta)
{
struct task_group *tg;
struct sched_entity *se;
long load_weight, load, shares;
long shares;
if (!cfs_rq)
return;
......@@ -791,32 +837,14 @@ static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, long weight_delta)
se = tg->se[cpu_of(rq_of(cfs_rq))];
if (!se)
return;
load = cfs_rq->load.weight + weight_delta;
load_weight = atomic_read(&tg->load_weight);
load_weight -= cfs_rq->load_contribution;
load_weight += load;
shares = (tg->shares * load);
if (load_weight)
shares /= load_weight;
if (shares < MIN_SHARES)
shares = MIN_SHARES;
if (shares > tg->shares)
shares = tg->shares;
#ifndef CONFIG_SMP
if (likely(se->load.weight == tg->shares))
return;
#endif
shares = calc_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, tg, weight_delta);
reweight_entity(cfs_rq_of(se), se, shares);
}
static void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
{
if (cfs_rq->load_unacc_exec_time > sysctl_sched_shares_window) {
update_cfs_load(cfs_rq, 0);
update_cfs_shares(cfs_rq, 0);
}
}
#else /* CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED */
static void update_cfs_load(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, int global_update)
{
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment