Commit 3dd1dd8c authored by Andrew Price's avatar Andrew Price Committed by Bob Peterson

GFS2: Use rht_for_each_entry_rcu in glock_hash_walk

This lockdep splat was being triggered on umount:

[55715.973122] ===============================
[55715.980169] [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
[55715.981021] 4.3.0-11553-g8d3de01c-dirty #15 Tainted: G        W
[55715.982353] -------------------------------
[55715.983301] fs/gfs2/glock.c:1427 suspicious rcu_dereference_protected() usage!

The code it refers to is the rht_for_each_entry_safe usage in
glock_hash_walk. The condition that triggers the warning is
lockdep_rht_bucket_is_held(tbl, hash) which is checked in the
__rcu_dereference_protected macro.

The rhashtable buckets are not changed in glock_hash_walk so it's safe
to rely on the rcu protection. Replace the rht_for_each_entry_safe()
usage with rht_for_each_entry_rcu(), which doesn't care whether the
bucket lock is held if the rcu read lock is held.
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Price <anprice@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarBob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Acked-by: default avatarSteven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
parent 6fde2242
......@@ -1417,14 +1417,14 @@ static struct shrinker glock_shrinker = {
static void glock_hash_walk(glock_examiner examiner, const struct gfs2_sbd *sdp)
{
struct gfs2_glock *gl;
struct rhash_head *pos, *next;
struct rhash_head *pos;
const struct bucket_table *tbl;
int i;
rcu_read_lock();
tbl = rht_dereference_rcu(gl_hash_table.tbl, &gl_hash_table);
for (i = 0; i < tbl->size; i++) {
rht_for_each_entry_safe(gl, pos, next, tbl, i, gl_node) {
rht_for_each_entry_rcu(gl, pos, tbl, i, gl_node) {
if ((gl->gl_name.ln_sbd == sdp) &&
lockref_get_not_dead(&gl->gl_lockref))
examiner(gl);
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment