From 356d6d5058c8082b9e811838ab2fa27825c947e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 23:27:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] exec: consolidate 2 fast-paths
Now that we don't pre-allocate the new ->sighand, we can kill the first fast
path, it doesn't make sense any longer. At best, it can save one "list_empty()"
check but leads to the code duplication.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Cc: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
fs/exec.c | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index c6e91c3dc2a1..ab5a4a3ece46 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -752,15 +752,6 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
struct task_struct *leader = NULL;
int count;
- /*
- * If we don't share sighandlers, then we aren't sharing anything
- * and we can just re-use it all.
- */
- if (atomic_read(&oldsighand->count) <= 1) {
- exit_itimers(sig);
- return 0;
- }
-
if (thread_group_empty(tsk))
goto no_thread_group;
--
GitLab