Commit 2cf55125 authored by Oliver Smith's avatar Oliver Smith Committed by Jozsef Kadlecsik
Browse files

netfilter: ipset: Fix serious failure in CIDR tracking



This fixes a serious bug affecting all hash types with a net element -
specifically, if a CIDR value is deleted such that none of the same size
exist any more, all larger (less-specific) values will then fail to
match. Adding back any prefix with a CIDR equal to or more specific than
the one deleted will fix it.

Steps to reproduce:
ipset -N test hash:net
ipset -A test 1.1.0.0/16
ipset -A test 2.2.2.0/24
ipset -T test 1.1.1.1           #1.1.1.1 IS in set
ipset -D test 2.2.2.0/24
ipset -T test 1.1.1.1           #1.1.1.1 IS NOT in set

This is due to the fact that the nets counter was unconditionally
decremented prior to the iteration that shifts up the entries. Now, we
first check if there is a proceeding entry and if not, decrement it and
return. Otherwise, we proceed to iterate and then zero the last element,
which, in most cases, will already be zero.
Signed-off-by: default avatarOliver Smith <oliver@8.c.9.b.0.7.4.0.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJozsef Kadlecsik <kadlec@blackhole.kfki.hu>
parent 169faa2e
......@@ -325,18 +325,22 @@ mtype_add_cidr(struct htype *h, u8 cidr, u8 nets_length)
static void
mtype_del_cidr(struct htype *h, u8 cidr, u8 nets_length)
{
u8 i, j;
for (i = 0; i < nets_length - 1 && h->nets[i].cidr != cidr; i++)
;
h->nets[i].nets--;
if (h->nets[i].nets != 0)
return;
for (j = i; j < nets_length - 1 && h->nets[j].nets; j++) {
h->nets[j].cidr = h->nets[j + 1].cidr;
h->nets[j].nets = h->nets[j + 1].nets;
u8 i, j, net_end = nets_length - 1;
for (i = 0; i < nets_length; i++) {
if (h->nets[i].cidr != cidr)
continue;
if (h->nets[i].nets > 1 || i == net_end ||
h->nets[i + 1].nets == 0) {
h->nets[i].nets--;
return;
}
for (j = i; j < net_end && h->nets[j].nets; j++) {
h->nets[j].cidr = h->nets[j + 1].cidr;
h->nets[j].nets = h->nets[j + 1].nets;
}
h->nets[j].nets = 0;
return;
}
}
#endif
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment