From 28f223782bca914ae65d08234c57c2175ecd7f5d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Laurent Meyer <meyerlau@fr.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 18:40:07 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [PATCH] s390: alternate signal stack handling bug
If a signal handler has been established with the SA_ONSTACK option but no
alternate stack is provided with sigaltstack(), the kernel still tries to
install the alternate stack. Also when setting an alternate stack with
sigalstack() and the SS_DISABLE flag, the kernel tries to install the
alternate stack on signal delivery. Use the correct conditions sas_ss_flags()
to check if the alternate stack has to be used.
Signed-off-by: Laurent Meyer <meyerlau@fr.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
---
arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c b/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c
index 5291b5f8788d..b4c815d8ef75 100644
--- a/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c
+++ b/arch/s390/kernel/compat_signal.c
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@ get_sigframe(struct k_sigaction *ka, struct pt_regs * regs, size_t frame_size)
/* This is the X/Open sanctioned signal stack switching. */
if (ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_ONSTACK) {
- if (! on_sig_stack(sp))
+ if (! sas_ss_flags(sp))
sp = current->sas_ss_sp + current->sas_ss_size;
}
--
GitLab