Commit 1086bbe9 authored by Dave Jones's avatar Dave Jones Committed by Pablo Neira Ayuso
Browse files

netfilter: ensure number of counters is >0 in do_replace()



After improving setsockopt() coverage in trinity, I started triggering
vmalloc failures pretty reliably from this code path:

warn_alloc_failed+0xe9/0x140
__vmalloc_node_range+0x1be/0x270
vzalloc+0x4b/0x50
__do_replace+0x52/0x260 [ip_tables]
do_ipt_set_ctl+0x15d/0x1d0 [ip_tables]
nf_setsockopt+0x65/0x90
ip_setsockopt+0x61/0xa0
raw_setsockopt+0x16/0x60
sock_common_setsockopt+0x14/0x20
SyS_setsockopt+0x71/0xd0

It turns out we don't validate that the num_counters field in the
struct we pass in from userspace is initialized.

The same problem also exists in ebtables, arptables, ipv6, and the
compat variants.
Signed-off-by: default avatarDave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
parent 3bfe0498
......@@ -1117,6 +1117,8 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, const void __user *user,
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct ebt_counter))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name) - 1] = 0;
......@@ -2159,6 +2161,8 @@ static int compat_copy_ebt_replace_from_user(struct ebt_replace *repl,
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct ebt_counter))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
memcpy(repl, &tmp, offsetof(struct ebt_replace, hook_entry));
......
......@@ -1075,6 +1075,9 @@ static int do_replace(struct net *net, const void __user *user,
/* overflow check */
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
......@@ -1499,6 +1502,9 @@ static int compat_do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user,
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
......
......@@ -1262,6 +1262,9 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, const void __user *user, unsigned int len)
/* overflow check */
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
......@@ -1809,6 +1812,9 @@ compat_do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
......
......@@ -1275,6 +1275,9 @@ do_replace(struct net *net, const void __user *user, unsigned int len)
/* overflow check */
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
......@@ -1822,6 +1825,9 @@ compat_do_replace(struct net *net, void __user *user, unsigned int len)
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct xt_counters))
return -ENOMEM;
if (tmp.num_counters == 0)
return -EINVAL;
tmp.name[sizeof(tmp.name)-1] = 0;
newinfo = xt_alloc_table_info(tmp.size);
......
Supports Markdown
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment