From 0d0fbbddcc27c062815732b38c44b544e656c799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2009 22:45:41 +1030
Subject: [PATCH] x86, msr, cpumask: Use struct cpumask rather than the
deprecated cpumask_t
This makes the declarations match the definitions, which already
use 'struct cpumask'.
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Acked-by: Borislav Petkov <borislav.petkov@amd.com>
LKML-Reference: <200911052245.41803.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
---
arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
index 9a00219b331a..5bef931f8b14 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr.h
@@ -264,12 +264,12 @@ static inline int wrmsr_on_cpu(unsigned int cpu, u32 msr_no, u32 l, u32 h)
wrmsr(msr_no, l, h);
return 0;
}
-static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void rdmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
struct msr *msrs)
{
rdmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, &(msrs[0].l), &(msrs[0].h));
}
-static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const cpumask_t *m, u32 msr_no,
+static inline void wrmsr_on_cpus(const struct cpumask *m, u32 msr_no,
struct msr *msrs)
{
wrmsr_on_cpu(0, msr_no, msrs[0].l, msrs[0].h);
--
GitLab