Commit 051ae7f7 authored by Paul Mackerras's avatar Paul Mackerras Committed by Ingo Molnar
Browse files

perf_counter tools: Reduce perf stat measurement overhead/skew



Vince Weaver reported a 'perf stat' measurement overhead in the
count of retired instructions, which can amount to a +6000
instructions inflated count in the reported count.

At present, perf stat creates its counters on the perf process.  Thus
the counters count the fork and various other activity in both the
parent and child, such as the resolver overhead for resolving PLT
entries for any libc functions that haven't been called before, such
as execvp.

This reduces the overhead by creating the counters on the child process
after the fork, using a couple of pipes to synchronize so that the
child process waits until the parent has created the counters before
doing the exec.  To eliminate the PLT resolution overhead on calling
execvp, this does a dummy execvp first which will always fail.

With this, the overhead of executing a program goes down from over
4800 instructions to about 90 instructions on powerpc (32-bit).
This was measured with a statically-linked program written in
assembler which only does the 3 instructions needed to call _exit(0).

Before:

$ perf stat -e 0:1:u ./three

 Performance counter stats for './three':

           4858  instructions

    0.001274523  seconds time elapsed

After:

$ perf stat -e 0:1:u ./three

 Performance counter stats for './three':

             92  instructions

    0.000468153  seconds time elapsed
Reported-by: default avatarVince Weaver <vince@deater.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPaul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
LKML-Reference: <19016.41425.814043.870352@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
parent 210ad39f
......@@ -99,7 +99,7 @@ static u64 runtime_cycles_noise;
#define ERR_PERF_OPEN \
"Error: counter %d, sys_perf_counter_open() syscall returned with %d (%s)\n"
static void create_perf_stat_counter(int counter)
static void create_perf_stat_counter(int counter, int pid)
{
struct perf_counter_attr *attr = attrs + counter;
......@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void create_perf_stat_counter(int counter)
attr->inherit = inherit;
attr->disabled = 1;
fd[0][counter] = sys_perf_counter_open(attr, 0, -1, -1, 0);
fd[0][counter] = sys_perf_counter_open(attr, pid, -1, -1, 0);
if (fd[0][counter] < 0 && verbose)
fprintf(stderr, ERR_PERF_OPEN, counter,
fd[0][counter], strerror(errno));
......@@ -205,12 +205,58 @@ static int run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
int status = 0;
int counter;
int pid;
int child_ready_pipe[2], go_pipe[2];
char buf;
if (!system_wide)
nr_cpus = 1;
if (pipe(child_ready_pipe) < 0 || pipe(go_pipe) < 0) {
perror("failed to create pipes");
exit(1);
}
if ((pid = fork()) < 0)
perror("failed to fork");
if (!pid) {
close(child_ready_pipe[0]);
close(go_pipe[1]);
fcntl(go_pipe[0], F_SETFD, FD_CLOEXEC);
/*
* Do a dummy execvp to get the PLT entry resolved,
* so we avoid the resolver overhead on the real
* execvp call.
*/
execvp("", (char **)argv);
/*
* Tell the parent we're ready to go
*/
close(child_ready_pipe[1]);
/*
* Wait until the parent tells us to go.
*/
read(go_pipe[0], &buf, 1);
execvp(argv[0], (char **)argv);
perror(argv[0]);
exit(-1);
}
/*
* Wait for the child to be ready to exec.
*/
close(child_ready_pipe[1]);
close(go_pipe[0]);
read(child_ready_pipe[0], &buf, 1);
close(child_ready_pipe[0]);
for (counter = 0; counter < nr_counters; counter++)
create_perf_stat_counter(counter);
create_perf_stat_counter(counter, pid);
/*
* Enable counters and exec the command:
......@@ -218,19 +264,9 @@ static int run_perf_stat(int argc, const char **argv)
t0 = rdclock();
prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_COUNTERS_ENABLE);
if ((pid = fork()) < 0)
perror("failed to fork");
if (!pid) {
if (execvp(argv[0], (char **)argv)) {
perror(argv[0]);
exit(-1);
}
}
close(go_pipe[1]);
wait(&status);
prctl(PR_TASK_PERF_COUNTERS_DISABLE);
t1 = rdclock();
walltime_nsecs[run_idx] = t1 - t0;
......
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment