Commit e160f917 authored by Robert Ricci's avatar Robert Ricci

Scoring rubric for papers3

parent 80b5dfaf
Paper Analysis #3 Score:
Paper Analysis #1 Score:
XX / 10 : Nussbaum and Richard
XX / 10 : Loesign et al.
XX / 10 : Kunz et al.
XX / 10 : Van Adrichem et al., NOMS 2014
For each evaluation, points are assigned as follows:
One point for each of the nine parts of the evaluation:
One point for each of the eight parts of the evaluation:
Answer shows careful consideration of the paper and the
question: 1 point
Answer shows a significant amount of consideration, but misses
important points: 0.5 points
Answer is cursory, or makes critical factual errors: 0.25 points
important points: 0.75 point
Answer is cursory, or makes critical factual errors: 0.5 points
Not answered or unsatisfactory answer: 0 points
One additional point for overall critical analysis
Point is awarded for identifying both strengths and weaknesses
Two additional points for overall critical analysis
Points awarded for identifying both strengths and weaknesses
in the paper's evaluation
For those that presented paper evaluations in class:
......
Markdown is supported
0% or
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment