Commit f4b0492c authored by Robert Ricci's avatar Robert Ricci

Scoring sheet for papers #2

parent bbd25776
HW #1 Score:
Paper Analysis #2 Score:
XX / 10 : Submitted a PDF
XX / 10 : Winstein et al. SIGCOMM
XX / 10 : Wang et al. SIGCOMM
XX / 10 : Mai et al. SIGCOMM
For each evaluation, points are assigned as follows:
One point for each of the nine parts of the evaluation:
Answer shows careful consideration of the paper and the
question: 1 point
Answer shows a significant amount of consideration, but misses
important points: 0.5 points
Answer is cursory, or makes critical factual errors: 0.25 points
Not answered or unsatisfactory answer: 0 points
One additional point for overall critical analysis
Point is awarded for identifying both strengths and weaknesses
in the paper's evaluation
For those that presented paper evaluations in class:
Ten points for the slides - five points each for:
Slides capture the most important points of the analysis
Slides are well-designed and clearly convey the information
Ten points for the presentation - five points each for:
Presenter covered the key points of the paper's evaluation
and his/her analysis of it
Presentation was clear, well-organized, and well-delivered
======
Total score: XX / YY
Markdown is supported
0% or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment