Lecture notes for Lecture 18

lectures/lecture18/Makefile

+DOCUMENTS= lecturenotes
+
+include ../../Makerules

lectures/lecture18/lecturenotes.tex

+\documentclass{article}[12pt]
+
+\usepackage[no-math]{fontspec}
+\usepackage{sectsty}
+\usepackage[margin=1.25in]{geometry}
+\usepackage{outlines}
+
+\setmainfont[Numbers=OldStyle,Ligatures=TeX]{Equity Text A}
+\setmonofont{Inconsolata}
+\newfontfamily\titlefont[Numbers=OldStyle,Ligatures=TeX]{Equity Caps A}
+\allsectionsfont{\titlefont}
+
+\title{CS6963 Lecture \#18}
+\author{Robert Ricci}
+\date{April 15, 2014}
+
+\begin{document}
+
+\maketitle
+
+\begin{outline}
+
+\1 Some very embarrassing mistakes
+    \2 Numbers that cannot possibly be right
+    \2 Failing to explain anything, just presenting graphs
+    \2 Strange oddities that were not explored at all
+    \2 Unreadable graphs
+    \2 Not answering the questions
+    \2 Logical flow from experiments to question answers to a conclusion
+    \2 Generally incurious about the results
+
+\1 Not using the tools from the class
+    \2 Picking number of runs
+    \2 Telling me which index of central tendency
+    \2 Some measure of variance
+    \2 Using statistical tests on means to prove difference or lack thereof
+
+\1 Why did we get different numbers?
+    \2 How clients were run - back to back or at the same time?
+    \2 Did we saturate the links?
+    \2 TC: All clients through one pipe?
+
+\1 Experience repeating someone else's experiment
+    \2 Who became more convinced of their own results?
+    \2 Less?
+    \2 What did it make you wish about how you did your own?
+    \2 Who had to talk to the "author"?
+    \2 Who had to have the author make changes?
+    \2 Did you actually manage to get similar results to the "author"?
+    \2 How well did the tools work - GENI and our own tools?
+
+\1 Why we are going to do it again:
+    \2 I want to have confidence in your evaluations
+    \2 I want you to actually apply tools from the class
+
+\1 Due date: the 30th? (last day of finals week)
+    \2 Willing to make deals with the defending MS students
+    
+\1 For next time (x2): what should we do review of?
+
+\end{outline}
+
+\end{document}