Checkpoint, make it through the end of the list

lectures/lecture3/lecturenotes.tex

@@ -51,12 +51,29 @@
         average of ratios or bad experiments
     \2 No sensitivity analysis: Analysis gives you evidence, not facts.
         What would change if setting changes?
+    \2 Ignoring errors in input: errors may be systematically biased
+        (eg. queues too long, drop work)
+    \2 Improper treatment of outliers: Is it an artifact of the evaluation
+        environment, or can it really happen?
+    \2 Assuming no change in the future: Big one for research, which is
+        supposed to be forward looking---assumptions and sensitivity analysis
+    \2 Ignoring variability: Don't just present mean! - eg. bimodal high/low
+        distribution
+    \2 Too complex analysis: Don't make it complex just for the sake of seeming
+        hard
+    \2 Improper presentation of results: Remember, about persuasion
+    \2 Ignoring social aspects: Again, about persuasion. Remember: you know 
+        a lot that the audience doesn't. Audience is rarely as expert as you in
+        the details of the thing you're writing about. Beliefs, values,
+        language, jargon.
+    \2 Omitting assumptions and limitations: Important in research---under what
+        conditions do you expect your conclusions to be true?
 
 \1 For next time
     \2 Read 2.2
     \2 HW \#2 due before class starts
     \2 HW \#3 will be handed out by class time
-    \3
+    \3 Need three volunteers to go first for paper anaylsis
 
 \end{outline}