Update grading rubric for 2015

assignments/papers2/score.txt

-Paper Analysis #2 Score:
+Paper Analysis #1 Score:
 
-XX / 10 : Winstein et al. SIGCOMM
+XX / 10 : Xu et al. CCS
 
-XX / 10 : Wang et al. SIGCOMM
-
-XX / 10 : Mai et al. SIGCOMM
+XX / 10 : Marinos et al. HotNets
 
 For each evaluation, points are assigned as follows:
-    One point for each of the nine parts of the evaluation:
+    One point for each of the eight parts of the evaluation:
         Answer shows careful consideration of the paper and the
             question: 1 point
         Answer shows a significant amount of consideration, but misses
-            important points: 0.5 points
-        Answer is cursory, or makes critical factual errors: 0.25 points
+            important points: 0.75 point
+        Answer is cursory, or makes critical factual errors: 0.5 points
         Not answered or unsatisfactory answer: 0 points
-    One additional point for overall critical analysis
-        Point is awarded for identifying both strengths and weaknesses
+    Two additional points for overall critical analysis
+        Points awarded for identifying both strengths and weaknesses
             in the paper's evaluation
 
 For those that presented paper evaluations in class: