Skip to content
GitLab
Projects
Groups
Snippets
Help
Loading...
Help
Help
Support
Community forum
Keyboard shortcuts
?
Submit feedback
Contribute to GitLab
Sign in / Register
Toggle navigation
E
Evaluating Networked Systems
Project overview
Project overview
Details
Activity
Releases
Repository
Repository
Files
Commits
Branches
Tags
Contributors
Graph
Compare
Issues
0
Issues
0
List
Boards
Labels
Service Desk
Milestones
Merge Requests
0
Merge Requests
0
Operations
Operations
Incidents
Analytics
Analytics
Repository
Value Stream
Members
Members
Collapse sidebar
Close sidebar
Activity
Graph
Create a new issue
Commits
Issue Boards
Open sidebar
Robert Ricci
Evaluating Networked Systems
Commits
4cb19eec
Commit
4cb19eec
authored
Mar 02, 2015
by
Robert Ricci
Browse files
Options
Browse Files
Download
Email Patches
Plain Diff
Not going to use lab3 this time
parent
4982916d
Changes
1
Hide whitespace changes
Inline
Side-by-side
Showing
1 changed file
with
0 additions
and
48 deletions
+0
-48
assignments/lab3/score.txt
assignments/lab3/score.txt
+0
-48
No files found.
assignments/lab3/score.txt
deleted
100644 → 0
View file @
4982916d
Lab #1 Score:
For all experiments, the following are evaluated:
a) Is the experimental methodology sound? For example, are the number
of runs selected properly, was care taken to avoid effects from outside
the system under test, etc.
b) Were appropriate indices of central tendency (eg. mean, median, mode)
and variance (eg. variance, stddev, confidence intervals, etc.) used?
c) Are the results presented in an appropriate and clear manner - eg. are
graphs well designed and readable?
d) If measurements are close, are appropriate methods used to show the
statistical significance of their similarity or difference?
e) Are the conclusions to be drawn from the numbers stated clearly?
XX / 10 : Experiment: timing sensitivity analysis experiment
XX / 20 : Experiment #1: Goodput and latency
xx / 20 : Experiment #2: Scaling
XX / 20 : Clear answers to all of the questions
Our plan had four questions to answer - are all of them answered
with clear answers that are supported by the evidence?
XX / 10 : Clearly presented conclusion
The report should include a clear conclusion that is supported by
the evidence ('it doesn't matter' and 'it depends on X and Y' are
suitable, so long as they are backed up with evidence
xx / 20 : Study artifacts
One of the products of the study was to be a repository that contained
everything necessary to reproduce the results found in the report.
This includes scripts to run the experiment, analyze the data, and
produce the figures in the report. Also included is a README describing
how to use these scripts
This score is based on how well the process is documented and
automated, not on a direct attempt to reproduce results.
Additional points may be deducted for deviating from the experiment plan without
a clear justification of why the change was made.
======
Total score: XX / YY
Write
Preview
Markdown
is supported
0%
Try again
or
attach a new file
.
Attach a file
Cancel
You are about to add
0
people
to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Cancel
Please
register
or
sign in
to comment